The University of Southern California has faced backlash after canceling the planned commencement speech by its valedictorian, Asna Tabassum, citing security concerns related to tensions over the ongoing conflict in the Middle East. Tabassum, a Muslim student, would have delivered her speech on May 10, but USC Provost Andrew Guzman announced the decision to revoke her speaking opportunity due to concerns about safety and potential disruptions at the event.

Critics had raised questions about Tabassum's social media activity, specifically a link she shared five years ago that called for the abolishment of the state of Israel and promoted Palestinian liberation. Pro-Israel and Jewish groups accused her of posting antisemitic content, leading to complaints to USC administrators. In response, Tabassum stated that she was being targeted by a campaign of hate and racism meant to silence her voice.

The Council on American-Islamic Relations in Los Angeles condemned USC's decision, calling it cowardly and disingenuous. They demanded that Tabassum be allowed to speak at commencement, emphasizing that the cancellation sends a negative message to Muslim and Palestinian students on campus. However, Guzman defended the university's actions, stating that the priority is to maintain a safe environment for all students and attendees.

The cancellation of Tabassum's speech has sparked a larger conversation about freedom of speech, campus security, and the impact of the conflict in the Middle East on college campuses. While USC stands by its decision to prioritize safety, many believe that the university missed an opportunity to support its valedictorian and uphold the values of academic freedom and diversity of thought. As tensions continue to escalate, the debate over the cancellation of Tabassum's speech highlights the complexities of navigating sensitive political issues in academic settings.