In a clash between the University of Pittsburgh and Boston College on Thursday night, fans witnessed a textbook example of a targeting penalty that resulted in an ejection. Pittsburgh ultimately emerged victorious with a 24-16 win over Boston College.

The incident occurred in the second quarter when Pittsburgh quarterback Nate Yarnell attempted a pass to tight end Malcolm Epps. As Epps battled to make a catch between Khari Johnson and KP Price, Johnson disregarded the ball and led with his helmet, making forcible contact with Epps. The impact was so severe that a penalty flag was immediately thrown.

A targeting penalty in college football is called when a player makes forceful contact against an opponent that goes beyond a normal tackle, block, or going after the ball. Often, it involves helmet-to-helmet contact and results in ejection from the game. Johnson's hit on Epps was a clear violation of this rule, leaving no room for debate.

The ejection did not deter Pittsburgh from securing the victory. It was quarterback Nate Yarnell's second career start, and he proved himself with 207 passing yards, a touchdown, and a rushing touchdown. Yarnell expressed gratitude for the opportunity and his love for Pitt, relishing the experience of being on the field.

The win was significant for Pittsburgh as it ended a four-game losing streak, improving their season record to 3-8. Meanwhile, Boston College fell to 6-5 on the season. The game showcased the intense and unpredictable nature of college football, with its traditions and passionate fans.

This incident reignited the ongoing debate among fans on social media regarding targeting calls in college football. While the sport's traditions, such as the Jeweled Shillelagh and the World's Largest Outdoor Cocktail Party, create a unique atmosphere each fall and winter, the targeting debate has become a modern tradition in itself.

The hit by Johnson exemplified the definition of a targeting penalty, as stated in the rulebook. It involved launching into the air to attack an opponent with an upward and forward thrust of the body, resulting in forcible contact to the head or neck area. The NCAA upholds strict guidelines to enforce player safety, and Johnson's actions clearly violated those principles.

Prior to the ejection, Johnson had showcased his skills earlier in the game by recording his first career interception in the end zone. Initially ruled incomplete, the play was overturned upon review, granting Johnson the interception and Boston College a touchback.

Johnson, a senior, is in his first season at Boston College after three years at Arkansas. Unfortunately, his impactful performance was cut short due to the ejection. He had contributed two tackles before exiting the game.

The ACC clash between Pittsburgh and Boston College provided a stark reminder of the consequences of dangerous hits on the field. The targeting penalty and subsequent ejection serve as a reminder of the NCAA's commitment to player safety and the importance of adhering to the rules.

The Associated Press contributed to this report, highlighting the significance of the incident and further emphasizing its impact on the game and the ongoing conversation surrounding targeting calls in college football.