Georgia AG accuses 61 'Cop City' protesters of racketeering and anarchist activities

23:46 05.09.2023

In a major development in the ongoing protests against the construction of a police training center in Atlanta, Georgia, 61 activists have been indicted on racketeering charges. The indictment, which was made public on Tuesday, accuses the defendants of illegally occupying the training site, engaging in vandalism and violence, and conspiring to prevent the construction of the Atlanta Public Safety Training Center.

The group at the center of the indictment is called "Defend the Atlanta Forest," and they have been leading the "Stop Cop City" effort for over two years. This group, made up of militant anarchists, eco-activists, and community organizers, has been vocal in their opposition to the $90 million police and fire training center, claiming that it will further militarize the police and cause environmental damage to an urban forest.

The indictment, issued on August 29, is a significant move by Georgia's state attorney general, Chris Carr, who condemned the defendants during a news conference on Tuesday. Carr stated that the defendants had conspired to commit acts of violence, intimidation, and property destruction in order to prevent the construction of the training center. He emphasized that each individual charged knowingly joined the conspiracy with the intention of stopping the project.

The indictment also revealed that most of the defendants are not from Georgia, indicating that there is a broader network at play in the protests against "Cop City." In fact, some defendants are facing additional charges, including domestic terrorism, arson, and money laundering. The use of the state's anti-racketeering law, commonly known as RICO, highlights the severity of the allegations against the activists.

The grand jury that issued the indictment is the same grand jury that previously indicted former President Donald Trump and his allies on RICO charges. This connection adds a significant layer of complexity to the case and raises questions about potential political motivations behind the indictment.

The announcement of the indictment has sparked mixed reactions. Activists fighting against the construction of the training center have condemned the charges, describing them as anti-democratic and accusing the state attorney general of using his power for political gain. The Cop City Vote coalition, which is leading a referendum against the project, issued a statement vowing to continue their fight.

In contrast, Georgia Governor Brian Kemp praised the action taken by the attorney general's office, emphasizing his commitment to keeping Georgians safe from what he called "out-of-state radicals." The governor's support for the indictment aligns with his stance on law and order and his prioritization of public safety.

The allegations outlined in the indictment are serious and range from criminal trespass and vandalism to throwing Molotov cocktails at police officers and issuing online threats. The indictment also links the defendants to previous charges related to domestic terrorism, money laundering, and felony intimidation.

It is worth noting that the protests against the training center escalated after the fatal shooting of a 26-year-old protester in January. State investigators claim that the shooting was in self-defense after the protester fired at them, but activists have questioned this account, adding another layer of controversy to the case.

Ultimately, the indictment against the 61 activists highlights the ongoing tensions surrounding the construction of the police training center in Atlanta. The charges and allegations raise important questions about the right to protest, the role of law enforcement, and the limits of dissent in a democratic society. As the case unfolds, it is likely to continue fueling debates around policing, activism, and the use of criminal charges to suppress dissent.

/ Tuesday, September 5, 2023, 11:46 PM /

themes:  Shooting  Donald Trump  Georgia

All rights to the materials belong to the sources indicated under the heading of each news and their authors.