In a controversial move, the City Council of New York is planning to remove art that features early American figures from city property. Critics argue that this decision reflects the leftist agenda of the council members, who are accused of being unqualified and incompetent. The removal of statues depicting great figures such as President George Washington, Christopher Columbus, John Jay, and Peter Stuyvesant has sparked outrage among patriotic Americans who believe that erasing these historical figures from public spaces is a dangerous attempt to rewrite history.

Critics draw parallels between the City Council's actions and George Orwell's dystopian novel "1984," in which the manipulation of history is a key tool of control. The removal of these statues is seen as a threat to America's democracy and its foundational documents, such as the Constitution. Critics accuse the City Council of displaying arrogance and ignorance by attempting to erase the very foundation of the country.

However, some argue that the City Council should also consider removing statues and references to the Democratic Party, which has a history of advocating for slavery and racial separation. The Democratic Party's role in perpetuating slavery and enforcing racial hostility during the era of the Dixiecrats is seen by some as deserving of condemnation. These critics assert that if the City Council is going to remove historical figures, they should also remove references to the Democratic Party.

Proponents of preserving the statues argue that historical figures should not be judged solely by today's standards. They emphasize that these figures, like everyone else, had their flaws and made mistakes, but they also played a significant role in shaping America's greatness. They accuse the leftist agenda of wanting to erase history rather than learn from it, diverting attention from the pressing issues the country currently faces, such as crime, open borders, and declining living standards.

As the debate rages on, critics also question the City Council's priorities. They argue that instead of focusing on issues such as budget cuts, regulating child-care services, or tackling rampant crime, the council seems more concerned with removing statues. Taxpayers are left frustrated and disillusioned, as they feel their money is being wasted on trivial matters.

Meanwhile, Senator Chuck Schumer has come under scrutiny for his decision to no longer enforce the dress code for senators. Critics see this as a demeaning move that undermines the dignity of the Senate. They argue that dressing appropriately is a sign of respect for the institution and its work. Some even mockingly suggest that the senators should don clown attire, reflecting the circus-like atmosphere they perceive in Washington.

Schumer's decision to change the dress code has raised questions about whether it is related to Senator John Fetterman's physical challenges resulting from a stroke. However, critics argue that other senators with physical disabilities, such as John McCain, Bob Dole, and Daniel Inouye, managed to dress appropriately despite their war wounds. They accuse Fetterman and Schumer of lacking decorum and respect for their colleagues.

Critics argue that the Senate should maintain a professional dress code, highlighting the importance of deportment and the need for senators to set an example. They believe that one member should not have the power to force 99 colleagues to disregard the longstanding dress code.

The deterioration of the Senate's dress code is seen by some as reflective of the decline in standards observed in many major cities. Pennsylvania residents, in particular, feel embarrassed by their senator's contribution to this deterioration and express the hope that he will be voted out in the next election.

Critics argue that focusing on changing the dress code instead of addressing pressing national issues like the economy, border crises, and national defense is a sign of misplaced priorities. They view the Senate floor as a place where weighty debates should be conducted with dignity and professionalism, rather than in shorts and hoodies.

In the midst of these controversies, the City Council's decision to remove historical statues and Senator Schumer's change to the dress code for senators have sparked heated debates about the preservation of history, the role of political parties, and the standards of professionalism in public institutions. As these discussions continue, the future of these statues and the expectations for decorum in the Senate remain uncertain.